Page 9 of 9
Arkansas Arkansas Truck Drivers Reach $4.75M Settlement Over Overtime and Wage Deductions
P.A.M. Transport Inc. v. Trucking Employees is a legal case involving nearly 8,000 drivers who alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for unpaid overtime and improper wage deductions. The dispute centered on how on-the-road hours were tracked and how driver pay was calculated.
Explore case ->
U.S. Federal Court Consulting Company Ordered to Pay Over $1.6 Million for Breaking Time Tracking Laws
Acosta v. Fire & Safety Investigation Consulting Servs, LLC is a legal case involving alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. A consulting company was investigated by the U.S. Department of Labor for failure to maintain accurate time records and pay proper overtime wages.
Explore case ->
California California Employer Ordered to Pay $99K for Overtime Violations Involving a Former Salaried Employee
Morales v. Factor Surfaces LLC is a dispute over unpaid overtime and missing records that led a former salaried worker to take legal action in California.
Explore case ->
Florida Beverage Company Settles Gender Discrimination and Wrongful Discharge Lawsuit for $300K
The EEOC filed a legal case against a bottled water company on behalf of a long-term Florida employee who alleged gender discrimination and wrongful discharge following an internal restructuring.
Explore case ->Florida Florida Restaurant Pays $200,000 to Settle Wrongful Discharge Lawsuit Involving Sexual Harassment and Retaliation
A legal case was brought against the owner of a Florida restaurant following allegations that female staff were subjected to ongoing harassment by a customer and that one employee was fired after reporting the conduct. The matter centered on claims of a hostile work environment and unlawful retaliation under federal law.
Explore case ->Florida Jury Awards $8.1 Million to Former Store Manager for Wrongful Termination After Cancer Diagnosis
A legal dispute involving a former retail store manager centered on allegations of wrongful termination and interference with medical leave during cancer treatment. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding substantial damages for emotional distress and punitive harm.
Explore case ->
